Time management. i think i prefer to talk of time arrangement. Time is a form of chaos, one of the most effective, consistent and intensive there is. Chaos is not something you manage, it is something that arranges itself as you and you then arrange parts of it in turn. Time is one of those parts. One does not manage time, one arranges it and it arranges one. Arrangement instead of management also shifts the feeling of the discursive environment slightly, from economics to art. An artist does not manage the colors on a canvas, or the words on a page, they arrange them, and are arranged themself in turn. Of course the differences between management and arrangement are not stable or essential, they are differences of intensity. Articulating differences of intensity always requires context. Just because someone “is” a ‘manager’ doesn’t mean that they don’t practice the art of arrangement of chaos in their work, it matters how, with what intent, with what feeling, in what context they are working in and with. The differences between management and arrangement are most visibly aesthetic, which makes sense since aesthetics are intensity. Maybe in this case, aesthetic differences become and act as ontoepistemological differences. Maybe they do so in every case, in part…