There are no simple genders. What is being non-binary? -> There is no simple way of being non-binary. This is not a definition in the conventional sense, it is not a naming that stops m"> There are no simple genders. What is being non-binary? -> There is no simple way of being non-binary. This is not a definition in the conventional sense, it is not a naming that stops m"> There are no simple genders. What is being non-binary? -> There is no simple way of being non-binary. This is not a definition in the conventional sense, it is not a naming that stops m">

What is a concept? -> Answer: "There are no simple concepts" (What is Philosophy?, pg. 15). This is not a conventional definition. It doesn't go "A concept is...". It is more of a feeling than a definition (which is also a definition). That's what I like about it. Saying: "There are no simple concepts" before saying what concepts are / saying that that is what concepts are communicates a certain frame of mind and ground to work on. Before you continue, right when you start, just letting you know, there is nothing simple ahead. This feeling, this immediate assertion and assumption brings me comfort. It speaks to me and allows me to exist the ways I am. I need a lack of simplicity to survive, we all do, but a lot of the time I feel I need a bit more than is currently available, allowed. What is gender? -> There are no simple genders. What is being non-binary? -> There is no simple way of being non-binary. This is not a definition in the conventional sense, it is not a naming that stops movement and change, as so many (colonial) definition and naming practices do. It is a kind of definition that is (in)complete, that leaves room, that acknowledges and encourages movement. It is reality.